Want to Know if Your MSP Is Real? Just Look at the Invoice. 

Share this article:

Want to Know if Your MSP Is Real Just Look at the Invoice. 

Most business owners evaluate their MSP based on presentations, cybersecurity claims, certifications, and sales pitches. 

I think there’s a much simpler test. 

Look at the invoice. 

The invoice often tells you more about your provider’s business model than any sales presentation ever will. 

When we review competitive MSP agreements, we continue to see the same pattern: 

  • 57 licenses of one thing 
  • 52 licenses of another 
  • 47 licenses of something else 
  • 8 hours of security consulting 
  • 3 security add-ons 
  • 4 email add-ons 
  • 2 monitoring add-ons 

Thirty-plus line items. 

And somehow, nobody can clearly explain where the numbers came from or how all of these products work together to create better business outcomes. 

I call this invoice bloat. 

More importantly, invoice bloat is usually a symptom of a much larger problem. 

The Problem Isn’t the Invoice 

The invoice itself isn’t the issue. 

The issue is the business model behind it. 

When I see an invoice filled with dozens of separate products, services, consulting hours, and security add-ons, it tells me the provider is focused on selling components rather than delivering outcomes. 

They’re managing a collection of products.  They’re not managing an operating environment. 

This is the classic Value Added Reseller (VAR) model wrapped in a monthly billing agreement. 

The monthly invoice may look modern, but the underlying business model often hasn’t changed. 

The focus remains on selling additional tools, additional services, and additional line items. 

A Mature MSP Thinks Differently 

A mature MSP approaches the problem from the opposite direction. 

The question isn’t: 

“What products can we sell this client?” 

The question is: 

“What does this client need to remain safe, secure, productive, and operationally effective?” 

A mature MSP should already know what technology stack is required to achieve those outcomes.  They don’t sell the parts.  They sell the outcome. 

The goal is to create a predictable, repeatable, well-managed environment that supports the client’s business objectives.  That means packaging the required technology, security controls, management services, and support into a solution that is easy to understand and easy to budget. 

Why Invoice Bloat Exists 

Invoice bloat usually appears when providers continue thinking like VARs.  Every challenge becomes another product.  Every new security concern becomes another add-on.  Every new capability becomes another line item. 

The result is an invoice that grows more complicated every year. 

Clients end up paying for an ever-expanding collection of products while gaining very little visibility into how those products work together to improve the business.  Meanwhile, the provider spends significant time managing licensing counts, product bundles, and service variations instead of focusing on strategic improvements and business outcomes. 

What Clients Actually Want 

Most business owners don’t want dozens of line items.  They want clarity and predictability.  They want confidence that their technology environment is secure, productive, and aligned with their business needs. 

A mature MSP provides a predictable monthly cost with an easy-to-understand package aligned with those needs.  The provider’s energy is spent improving outcomes rather than figuring out how to sell more line items. 

Want to Know if Your MSP is Real Just Look At the Invoice

The Restaurant Menu Test

Here’s a simple rule: 

If your IT invoice looks like a restaurant menu, you’re probably not working with a mature MSP. 

You’re working with a VAR that bills monthly. 

And understanding that difference can completely change how you evaluate your technology partner. 

The best MSPs don’t sell products. 

They deliver outcomes. 

The invoice should make that obvious. 

Picture of Edward Stringfellow

Edward Stringfellow

Is the founder and CEO of Stringfellow Technology Group. He leads the team in delivering simple, secure IT solutions for business leaders. Edward holds a computer science degree from Vanderbilt University, where he lectures, and an MBA from the University of Alabama.

Share this article:

Do you want to grow 30% faster than industry average?

We work best with growing firms who want proactive, executive-level IT strategy, not just help desk tickets.

If that’s you, we’d love to talk.

What You’ll Get From The Conversation:

  • Real Recommendations – We’ll share what we’d do, even if we don’t work together.
  • A Strategic Fit Check – Is your business aligned with how we deliver outcomes?
 

Connect to learn more.

Glenn Harris

Business Growth Advisor

Glenn Harris

With over 25 years of business technology experience, Glenn leads our efforts in delivering reliable IT to growing businesses looking to achieve success.

With over two decades of business technology experience, Glenn leads our efforts in delivering reliable IT to growing businesses looking to achieve success.

With over 25 years of growing and leading businesses, Jay understands firsthand the challenges leaders face and strive for resolution and growth.

Karen Thompson

Karen Thompson

Glenn Harris

Business Growth Advisor

With over 25 years of business technology experience, Glenn leads our efforts in delivering reliable IT to growing businesses looking to achieve success.

Karen Thompson

Business Growth Advisor

With her experience to translate business challenges into clear, practical solutions. Karen helps organizations design strategies to achieve success.

Categories

Contact Us To Learn More

Would you like to get in touch to learn more about our proven approach to managed IT services?

Fill out the form below and let’s connect.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Stay in the loop! Check this box to receive occasional updates and offers via SMS (optional).

Schedule a Call with Glenn

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.